Saq - Explain Two Errors in Attribution

Explain two cracks in attribution: One flaw in attribution is the fundamental attribution illusion, which is when wad overappraisal the role of dispositional factors in an individuals behavior and underrating the situational factors. The study by Ross et al. (1977) aimed to see if the fundamental attribution error would occur even if the observers knew that all actors were simply playing a role. Participants were assigned one of three roles; a game-show legions, contestants on the show, or members of the audience. Observers ranked consistently ranked the game show legions as the most intelligent of the participants even though they knew he was asking the questions and that he was assigned to that position. The reason why he was ranked the most intelligent is because people with social meridian executive usually initiate and oblige conversations; their knowledge concerning a item topic can give some others the impression that they be conditioned on a large range of ot her topics as well.

A second error is self-serving bias, which is when people render reliance for their successes, attributing them to dispositional factors, and dissociates themselves from their failures, attributing them to situational factors. Lau and Russel (1980) found that American football teams move to credit their wins to internal factors, ex. Being in good shape. When teams failed it would be because of out-of-door factors, ex. Injuries. Greenberg et al. (1982) basically says that by attributing our success to dispositional factors and our failures to factors beyond our control the SSB serves as a means of self-protection. T herefore when teams attribute their failures! to factors they fagt have control of, they actually protect their self-esteem.If you want to sit a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay